Talk:BG Group

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Berkshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Berkshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Berkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BerkshireWikipedia:WikiProject BerkshireTemplate:WikiProject BerkshireBerkshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Energy Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

}}

Untitled

if someone could centre the text in the board of tables i've just inserted that would be great. Dexcel (talk) 07:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC) 05:39, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

All of of the claims in the Controversy section are dubious and/or unsourced.

Was BG the company using the Deepwater Horizon rig? I thought this was BP. The cited reference gives no support, and the Deepwater Horizon article does not mention BG.
No citation is provided for BG involvement in the Texas City Refinery explosion, and the Wikipedia article does not mention BG.
The cited reference does not mention any involvement of BG in tar sands.
The cited reference does not mention any involvement of BG in Angola or Columbia.

I propose deleting this section. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:04, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Verbcatcher:The reference does mention the BG Group, but the editor seems to have mistakenly added the information for BP. I've corrected the section to reflect the information provided by the source. The source's publisher is RepRisk, not sure how reliable they, there is an article about them sitting in AfC Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/RepRisk.

As a side note Deepwater was leased to BP but owned and operated by Transocean with contractors from Halliburton (at least that's what I understand fromt he wiki article). Jonpatterns (talk) 19:03, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the editor posted material that related to BP, not to BG. Thank you for updating the article. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:53, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on BG Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]